Reply: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients with different biological agents.

We thank Dr Mungmunpuntipantip and colleague for their interest and thoughtful comments on our publication. The authors have highlighted several important considerations for the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with different biological agents. We fully agree with the author's point of view, and we also point out the limitations in our meta-analysis.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients with different biological agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are concerns regarding the effect of biological agents on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed about the serological responses, breakthrough infections and clinical relapse of IBD patients treated with biological agents following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Primary outcomes were the pooled seroconversion rates, breakthrough infection rates and clinical relapse rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD patients treated with biological agents. Secondary outcomes were the comparison of seroconversion rates, breakthrough infection rates and clinical relapse rates in IBD patients treated with biological agents and control cohort after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis. A high percentage of seroconversion (96.6%, 99% and 99.2%) was achieved in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF-α therapy, vedolizumab and ustekinumab after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, respectively. The pooled breakthrough infection rate was 2.5% and 3.9% in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF-α therapy and vedolizumab, respectively. The breakthrough infection rate in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF-α therapy was significantly lower than control cohort (RR 0.178, 95% CI 0.084-0.378). The pooled clinical relapse rate in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF-α therapy, vedolizumab and ustekinumab was 6.9%, 5.4% and 5.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall seroconversion rate after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD patients treated with biological agents is high. The overall breakthrough infection rate and clinical relapse rate in IBD patients treated with biological agents were low.

Self-reported Treatment Goals in Chinese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic recurrent disease, and the treatment goals of inflammatory bowel disease are mainly based on doctors' perspective, but there are some differences between the doctor's perspective and the patient's perspective. The aim of this study is to understand the treatment goals and the related factors from the patients' perspective during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A total of 212 participants were recruited to fill out the questionnaires including clinical characteristics and treatment goals. Eleven treatment goals were measured by a Short-Form 34 questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the related factors about these treatment goals. RESULTS: A total of 212 inflammatory bowel disease patients were enrolled in this study. The most concerned treatment goal was the improvement of quality of life (mean score was 8.54), while mean score of ulcerative colitis patients and Crohn's disease patients was 9.10 and 8.45, respectively. We had also found some related factors such as the type of disease, the course of disease, the frequency of hematochezia, and defecation. CONCLUSION: Our survey showed that inflammatory bowel disease patients pay more attention to the improvement of quality of life and few drugs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There are some related factors such as the type of disease, the course of dis- ease, the frequency of hematochezia, and defecation. Our results help clinicians understand the patients' treatment goals, which can contribute to better management of inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Qingjin Yiqi granules for post-COVID-19 condition: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Qingjin Yiqi granules (QJYQ) on post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). METHOD: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups, the QJYQ group received QJYQ combined with standard rehabilitation treatments (SRTs) and the control group only received SRTs. The treatment course was 14 days. The primary outcomes were modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and Borg scale, while the secondary outcomes included symptoms score and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). The safety outcome was the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients with PCC were enrolled and randomly assigned to the QJYQ group (n = 194) and the control group (n = 194). Compared to the controls, the mMRC scale was improved in the QJYQ group, which was better than that of the control group [ß (95%CI): -0.626 (-1.101, -0.151), p = 0.010]. A significant improvement in Borg scale was also observed in the QJYQ group compared to the control group [ß (95%CI): -0.395(-0.744, -0.046), p = 0.026]. There was no statistically significant difference in symptoms score and 6MWD between the two groups (p = 0.293, p = 0.724). No treatment-related adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: QJYQ can bring benefits to patients with PCC, mainly in the improvement of breathlessness and fatigue.

Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COS-COVID).

Since its outbreak in December 2019, a series of clinical trials on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered or carried out. However, the significant heterogeneity and less critical outcomes of such trials may be leading to a waste of research resources. This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for clinical trials on COVID-19 in order to tackle the outcome issues. The study was conducted according to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Handbook: Version 1.0, a guideline for COS development. A research group was set up that included experts in respiratory and critical medicine, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), evidence-based medicine, clinical pharmacology, and statistics, in addition to medical journal editors. Clinical trial registry websites (www.chictr.org.cn and clinicaltrials.gov) were searched to retrieve clinical trial protocols and outcomes in order to form an outcome pool. A total of 78 clinical trial protocols on COVID-19 were included and 259 outcomes were collected. After standardization, 132 outcomes were identified within seven different categories, of which 58 were selected to develop a preliminary outcome list for further consensus. After two rounds of Delphi survey and one consensus meeting, the most important outcomes for the different clinical classifications of COVID-19 were identified and determined to constitute the COS for clinical trials on COVID-19 (COS-COVID). The COS-COVID includes one outcome for the mild type (time to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negativity), four outcomes for the ordinary type (length of hospital stay, composite events, score of clinical symptoms, and time to 2019-nCoV RT-PCR negativity), five outcomes for the severe type (composite events, length of hospital stay, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), duration of mechanical ventilation, and time to 2019-nCoV RT-PCR negativity), one outcome for critical type (all-cause mortality), and one outcome for rehabilitation period (pulmonary function). The COS-COVID is currently the most valuable and practical clinical outcome set for the evaluation of intervention effect, and is useful for evidence assessment and decision-making. With a deepening understanding of COVID-19 and application feedback, the COS-COVID should be continuously updated.